Sunday, October 8, 2006

Scholars Unite!

Saturday 7:50 am. I woke to the wreckage of nail salons: crumbling glass, scattered particle-board, chairs, and three dusty men dismantling endless hours of beauty. Helpful sign explains: “WE HAVE MOVE.” It seemed early to be pillaging, at least on the Upper West Side. Why, most people haven’t even finished their Pilates yet, not to mention walking their pugs and baking their organic brioches. I was irritated to find that the new staffperson at the 93rd Street Starbucks seemed to think we were living in the ‘burbs. She smiled a TV smile (in HD) and threw me a perky plastic how-are-you, and when I (grudging, mumbling, quiet) returned the formality she went into a story about how tired she is [insert braying laugh a la Rachael Ray here]... but she’ll make it, thanks. My subsequent smile was like the crisper in my refrigerator: full of wilted, dried-up, and congealed things. If I had been carrying a volume of Sartre I might have climbed over the counter and attacked her with it. Morning is not my time.

Ah, safely back in the apartment. Whew. I try to really make an art of my grumpiness while it lasts, to live it to the last drop; I am not sure it is not a strange, amphibian form of happiness.

Speaking of grumpiness, I was over again seeing how a real blog works at The Rest Is Noise, and I read the following:
... the one [concert] that cannot be missed is the mainstage Carnegie bill of Electric Counterpoint (with Pat Metheny), Different Trains (with the Kronos), and Music for 18 Musicians (with Reich and his ensemble). I don't see anything as exciting on the entire New York season schedule...

Ummm, excuse me? What about Jeremy Denk’s super-wuper fantastically exciting all-Bach recital on Oct. 20th in the new exciting totally unusual late-night format at the Kaplan Penthouse at Lincoln Center (tickets available)? Or Jeremy Denk’s thrilling debut wild-possibly-involving-naked-supermodels appearance at Carnegie Hall with Orpheus Chamber Orchestra, Dec. 2nd? Just to pick a couple items at random from the concert schedule, items I have no stake in whatsoever, you know, just, by the way. I thought I worked that in pretty well, don’t you? Not too pluggy, kind of seamless?

And then to speak again of grumpiness, a while back I went a bit to town on the first episode of Greg Sandow’s book on the future of classical music. I have to admit I’m not in love with the formulation “performing” a book, but I let myself be carried full tilt into high dudgeon, overhastily. I went back there and it appears he took in a lot of criticism and decided to start again, writing more tightly and with less anecdote; he seems to be reangling it as a kind of historical account of how classical music got “boxed in.” The following passage made me pause uneasily:

This scholarly, detached, analytical view of classical music then gets translated into the formality of performances, the immobility and silence of the musicians and the audience, and the lack of communication, the lack of any explanation of what's really going on (which I've criticized so relentlessly in earlier episodes). All this turns many people off, especially since it runs directly against almost every trend in contemporary culture. How can people who (for example) listen to pop music that offers strong views about contemporary life, and about which listeners have really strong opinions--loving this band, hating that one--accept a classical music world in which they're told, repeatedly, in measured, unexcited tones, how great the great composers are?

But there is something courageous about it. Here on Think Denk, we try to get as excited as we can about Bach etc., and try to pass it on through verbiage and (soon to come, exciting exciting!) sound bites, but we (royal) have to admit Mr. Sandow has a generally true-feeling point. To argue with what he is saying seems like arguing with commonsense, with the same pros and cons. Go ahead and argue; you may be right, but ignore it at your peril. In fact he has a lot of points that feel queasily correct in the main though I get nervous about the wide net he is casting ... To cite my main qualm, I guess I feel he’s a little too comfortable with generalizations, and with the deadly Grouping Of Stereotypes Fallacy (“scholarly, detached, analytical”)... Scholarly does not have to be detached, or analytical, for instance. Analysis is not necessarily detached either. These are all free-floating "connotations." And then he equates the scholarly attitude with the detached immobile performances, claiming a causality. But often it seems to me just the opposite: the scholars are the ones getting excited about the music while the performers, who are too busy to hear from them or don’t want to hear from them or think they don’t have anything to offer, ignore them and offer up the same old same old conservatory crap. How’s that for blunt? Strike one for scholars!

So I have my Denkish qualms, but am impressed by the rewrite and new approach. Go read Sandow’s stuff, and I apologize for jumping on the first post: so very Jeremy and so impatient. The ocean is still teaching me (vis a vis last post).

Then, to survey other areas of the Classical-Web, I noticed there’s a big discussion of the “pretentiousness” of classical music going on at Sequenza21. This seems to me largely a discussion between composers, and am I generalizing too much (a la Sandow) if I see this discussion and the word “pretentious” as a euphemism for what is quickly becoming the Composers’ Eternal Question:
Should I write tonal, boppy stuff, or not?

I imagine the devil posing that question, slyly, in the postmodern wilderness ... Please enjoy, among other things, the myriad spellings of “pretentiousness” that sprinkle this forum, which made me doubt my own memory, and which evokes, charmingly, composers at play, perhaps multitasking, transposing on Finale or Sibelius in the background while burning CDs in another window and pondering music’s moral state in between, too busy to avail themselves of a spellchecker. This is all coming out overly snarky ... am a big fan of Sequenza 21 ...

Without being presumptuous, I guess it will have to be up to me to answer the Eternal Question for all composers for All Time. I would refer them once again to Roland Barthes’ wonderful dictum “there is only what I would choose to write, to put forth in this world of mine, and what I choose not to.” I apply this dictum daily, thousands of times, when playing the same old boring totally unexciting (just kidding, for those with no ear for irony) Bach phrase again, or some stupid out-of-touch-with-modernity (still kidding!) Beethoven thingy, and I am teetering between “Ways To Play This” and some are Interesting, some are Unexpected, some are Classic--oh oh oh, the burden of choice!--and then finally there is a period of honestly asking myself, “what would I choose to hear? how is this meaningful to me? what makes me sit back and say that is beautiful?” and there is the test, does this wow me, is what I’m hearing interesting to me, 2006 Jeremy?, and I look for the answers through that set of questions (and similar)... through the self-wow test ... It’s all really spectacularly beautiful heady totally tremendous stuff, so that when I have to go out of the apartment and away from my Linus-esque security blanket combo of piano and Great Masters to get some coffee from some perky young thing I get a little, you know, on edge.

Friday, October 6, 2006

Opinión: Marcuse y el "Baby Depor"

Con la entrada del nuevo siglo el fútbol dió un lavado de cara poco recomendado. La dichosa "Ley Bosman", junto a los lucrosos contratos televisivos que los equipos firmaron, hicieron en España y en el mundo en general, un flaco favor al balompié.
Los presidentes de los equipos, transformados en "reyes Midas", no midieron en sus gastos y ficharon jugadores por encima de sus precios reales, teniendo en cuenta que podían fichar jugadores europeos o con pasaporte a golpe de talonario. Así, los equipos llenaban sus plantillas con jugadores extranjeros, dejando a un lado a la cantera.
Esto para todos los clubs, se convirtió en pan para hoy y hambre para mañana. Y es que todos los equipos, salvo casos obligados como el Athletic, dejaron sus canteras al margen, siendo éstas menospreciadas.
En los años 60', las teorías del filósofo Herbert Marcuse eran seguidas y alabadas. Comentaba entre sus teoría, que los cambios sociales llegaban de la mano de las revoluciones juveniles, ya que el pensamiento de los jóvenes no estaba viciado todavía por el devenir social. En 1968 se produjo la revuelta estudiantil en París y un año más tarde llegaba la archiconocida revolución del 69', con claros matices y preceptos de los escritos de Marcuse.
Paralelamente en el tiempo, el Deportivo de la Coruña parece verse reflejado en el espejo a Marcuse.
Con un equipo casi en bancarrota (tiene unos 150 millones de € en deuda), y jugadores venidos a menos por la edad de la plantilla, al equipo no le ha quedado más remedio que adaptarse a los mandamientos del filósofo alemán.
Considero que es un acierto este tipo de proyecto, aparte de poder ser un ejemplo para el resto de los equipos. Fichar jugadores jóvenes con gran proyección, aseguran en cierta medida, no solo la duración de la plantilla, sino la posibilidad de poder salir a flote a medio-largo plazo económicamente. Todo esto aderazado de la conocida frase: "juventud, divino tesoro".
Confiar en jugadores jóvenes, es saber que apuestas por gente que por lo menos se van da dejar la vida en el terreno de juego, aparte de no estar todavía viciados por grandes contratos y flashes. La juventud concede hambre de títulos y al cuadro de Lendoiro no le viene nada mal.
Con ello, y la elección de un entrenador que sabe exprimir las cualidades de estos chavales, el Deportivo parece poder recuperar laureles perdidos que antaño permitía a los seguidores coruñeses la posibilidad de poder celebrar los títulos en la plaza de Cuatro Caminos.
Por ahora las cosas no les van nada mal. Sin perder un punto en casa (Riazor parece volver a ser un fortín), el "Baby Depor" asoma la cabeza por la zona alta de la Liga. Y es que el "Totem" Marcuse parece haberse convertido en símbolo de adoración en tierras herculinas.

Wednesday, October 4, 2006

Opinión: Cuentos de Don Quijote

Hace unos días aparecía el Sr. Calderón en el programa de Cuatro, Maracaná 06', siendo el mensajero de ya reconocibles tambores de guerra que venían de hace tiempo.
El presidente de R. Madrid y a colación de la convocatoria de jugadores madridistas por la selección española, aseguraba saliendo por peteneras, que los jugadores del R. Madrid se sentían orgullosos de jugar para la selección, resaltando, que no así otros jugadores "españoles".
El tema tiene su miga, ya no sólo por las diversas razones políticas que provocan estas insinuaciones, sino por el flagrante hecho de criticar, aunque sea de forma elegante, la credibilidad de determinados jugadores para con la camiseta española.
"Cayus Brutus" Calderón, probablemente haya encendido con esas declaraciones la mecha de una bomba que llevaba tiempo cargándose.
Y es que determinados hechos en el pasado han terminado por declarar la guerra a determinados jugadores. Las malas actuaciones de la selección ya tendrán, junto a Aragonés, otros inculpados en la mesa de acusados. Su delito: "no sudar la camiseta" .
Desde mi punto de vista, y probablemente sea atacado por esto, los jugadores que acuden a la llamada de la selección lo hacen convencidos. No creo por ello, que el bajo rendimiento de la selección sea a causa de creencias políticas, religiosas o sociales.
Digo todo esto, partiendo de la base de que cualquier jugador es libre de decidir si quiere acudir a la selección. Un futbolista, por razonamiento lógico, que no se considere afín a ciertas creencias, lógicamente, hará caso a su raciocinio, y en este caso concreto no acudirá a la llamada de Luis.
El caso de uno de los hombres "most wanted" en este país, Oleguer, se hace casi surrealista. Sin entrar a valorar temas políticos (y esto lo quiero recalcar), Oleguer ha demostrado sensatez a la hora de declarar que no le llama para nada la Roja. Aunque pienso que no es un jugador convocable, ha demostrado por lo menos ser sincero..es ridículo criticar a alguien por ser sincero.
Por ello y aún con pesadillas por la derrota ante las tropas del "Comandante Zidane", seguimos buscando fantasmas por nuestro juego y posibilidades. Y es que en el país de Don Quijote, cada vez hay más molinos de viento....